AI, Regulation
Adoption of NAIC Model Bulletin
Tracking adoption of the NAIC's Model Bulletin on AI Use.
Elaine Gibbs, June 24, 2024
Seventeen states and districts have adopted the NAIC Model Bulletin on the use of AI by insurers, in part or in whole, as of: August 9, 2024.
In order of adoption:
Alaska, February 1, 2024, Bulletin B 24-01: No notable changes
New Hampshire, February 20, 2024, Docket #INS 24-011-AB:
Strongly encourages development of verification and testing methods to identify errors and limit unfair discrimination (as opposed to simply encourages)
Updates “bias analysis and minimization” in reference to data management practices to “unfair bias analysis and minimization”
Nevada, February 23, 2024, Bulletin 24-001: No notable changes
Connecticut, February 26, 2024, Bulletin MC-25:
Insurers must complete annual Artificial Intelligence Certification that attests to compliance with the Bulletin
Vermont, March 12, 2024, Insurance Bulletin 229: No notable changes
Illinois, March 13, 2024, Company Bulletin 2024-08: No notable changes
Rhode Island, March 15, 2024, Insurance Bulletin 2024-03: No notable changes
Pennsylvania, April 6, 2024, Notice 2024-04: No notable changes
Kentucky, April 16, 2024, Bulletin 2024-02:
Clarifies that the guidelines in the bulletin are non-binding and softens the overall tone, using phrases like “the Department recommends,” “the Department advises,” or “controls would ideally address”
Maryland, April 22, 2024, Bulletin 24-11:
Extends scope from insurers to include nonprofit health service plans, HMOs, and dental plan organizations
Washington, April 22, 2024, Technical Assistance Advisory 2024-02: No notable changes
District of Columbia, May 21, 2024, Bulletin 24-IB-002-05/21: No notable changes
Nebraska, June 11, 2024, IGD -- H1: No notable changes
Virginia, July 22, 2024, Administrative Letter 2024-01:
Strongly encourages development of verification and testing methods to identify errors and limit unfair discrimination (as opposed to simply encourages)
Updates goal of program from “mitigate the risk” of adverse consumer outcomes to “eliminate the risk”
Strengthens much of the language, such as AI governance programs “should address” the various items listed as opposed to “consider addressing”
Arkansas, July 31, 2024, Bulletin 13-2024: No notable changes
Michigan, August 7, 2024, Bulletin 2024-20-INS: No notable changes
West Virginia, August 9, 2024, Insurance Bulletin 24-06: Notable changes
Softens language from what insurers “should” do in their AI governance programs to what “OIC … recommends” the insurers “would ideally” do
Largely removes sections on legislative authority as well as regulatory oversight and examination considerations, while noting that an investigation or market conduct action may include questions about use of AI and related governance
In addition, Colorado and New York have adopted their own frameworks for regulating AI use by insurers.
Latest articles
Get in touch.
Curious how we can help? Let's discuss.
Reach us at hello@bell-analytics.com.